Best Machine Learning Development Agencies

Provectus vs Addepto: full comparison for 2026

Last updated: July 2026

Quick verdict

Provectus (4.5/5) edges ahead of Addepto (4.1/5) overall. Provectus is the better choice for mid-market and enterprise buyers who want AI/ML delivery bundled with cloud and big-data engineering from one integrator.. Addepto is the stronger option for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Provectus vs Addepto: head-to-head summary

Criterion Provectus Addepto
Founded 2010 2018
HQ Palo Alto, California, USA Warsaw, Poland
Team size 501–1,000 51–200
Rating 4.5 / 5 4.1 / 5
Best for Mid-market and enterprise buyers who want AI/ML delivery bundled with cloud and big-data engineering from one integrator. Companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition.
Pricing model Fixed project and dedicated team engagements Fixed project and consulting retainer
Min. engagement $50K $20K
Primary tech stack Python, TensorFlow, PyTorch Python, Scikit-learn, TensorFlow
Industries served Retail, Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology/SaaS Financial Services, Retail, Manufacturing

Provectus vs Addepto: overview

Provectus

Provectus is an AI and cloud engineering consultancy founded in 2010 by Stepan Pushkarev, headquartered in Palo Alto with 500–1,000 employees across roughly nine locations. The company positions itself as a mid-market AI-first systems integrator, combining big-data engineering, cloud engineering, and applied ML/AI practices, and holds partner status with major cloud providers (per company website; independently unverifiable exact partnership tier).

Addepto

Addepto is an AI and data consulting company founded in Warsaw, Poland in 2018 by Edwin Lisowski and Artur Haponik (one source lists 2017), specializing in machine learning, artificial intelligence, and business intelligence solutions. Reported headcount is roughly 55–58 employees across Europe, North America, and Asia. In December 2025, Addepto was acquired by KMS Technology; prospective clients should confirm how the acquisition affects team continuity, existing contracts, and service delivery going forward.

Services and capabilities: Provectus vs Addepto

Capability Provectus Addepto
Custom ML model development
Deep learning & computer vision
NLP & LLM / Generative AI
MLOps & production deployment
Data engineering
AI strategy consulting
Staff augmentation

Tech stack comparison: Provectus vs Addepto

Framework / platform Provectus Addepto
Python
TensorFlow
PyTorch N/A
AWS
Azure N/A
Google Cloud N/A N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A
Databricks N/A N/A
LangChain N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Provectus vs Addepto

Criterion Provectus Addepto
Minimum engagement $50K $20K
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Consulting retainer
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Accessible Accessible

Target audience comparison: Provectus vs Addepto

Dimension Provectus Addepto
Best company size Mid-market to enterprise Startup to mid-market
Best industries Retail, Healthcare, Financial Services Financial Services, Retail, Manufacturing
Best use cases Consolidating a fragmented cloud + data + ML stack under one delivery partner, Standing up a big-data platform that feeds downstream ML models Mid-market companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting now paired with KMS Technology's broader resources, Business intelligence projects that also require a machine learning component
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Provectus vs Addepto: pros and cons

Provectus
+ 15 years of continuous operation gives a longer delivery track record than most boutiques on this list
+ Combines data engineering and MLOps with model development, reducing hand-off friction between teams
+ 500–1,000 employee scale supports multiple concurrent enterprise workstreams
+ Established cloud-provider relationships support production deployment at scale
- Broader systems-integrator scope means ML-specialist depth is spread across cloud and data-engineering practices rather than singularly focused
- Mid-market pricing and minimums put it out of reach for very small pilot projects
- Public reporting on exact current headcount varies by source (500–1,000 vs. ~700), so buyers should confirm team size directly
Addepto
+ 7 years of focused AI/BI consulting experience prior to the KMS Technology acquisition
+ Small team size historically meant direct founder-level access on engagements
+ Multi-continent presence (Europe, North America, Asia) despite a compact headcount
+ Acquisition by KMS Technology (Dec 2025) may bring additional delivery resources and stability
- Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025 — buyers should confirm how this affects team continuity, pricing, and existing contracts before signing
- Public sources disagree on exact founding year (2017 vs. 2018) and employee count (55 vs. 58)
- Post-acquisition integration could change the service delivery model in ways not yet publicly documented

Who should choose Provectus?

Provectus is the right choice for mid-market and enterprise buyers who want AI/ML delivery bundled with cloud and big-data engineering from one integrator..

Combines AI/ML delivery with cloud and big-data engineering as a single integrated systems-integrator practice.. Minimum engagement starts at $50K. Works best with clients in Retail, Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology/SaaS.

Who should choose Addepto?

Addepto is the right choice for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition..

Boutique AI/BI consultancy that gained additional scale and resources through its December 2025 acquisition by KMS Technology.. Minimum engagement starts at $20K. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Retail, Manufacturing.

Decision matrix: Provectus vs Addepto

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Provectus
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Provectus
Your budget is at the lower end Addepto
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Provectus
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Provectus

Use case fit: Provectus vs Addepto

Use case Provectus fit Addepto fit Winner
Consolidating a fragmented cloud + data + ML stack under one delivery partner Strong Limited Provectus
Standing up a big-data platform that feeds downstream ML models Strong Limited Provectus
Mid-market companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting now paired with KMS Technology's broader resources Limited Strong Addepto
Business intelligence projects that also require a machine learning component Limited Strong Addepto
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Provectus vs Addepto

Provectus (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Combines AI/ML delivery with cloud and big-data engineering as a single integrated systems-integrator practice.. It is best for mid-market and enterprise buyers who want AI/ML delivery bundled with cloud and big-data engineering from one integrator..

Addepto (4.1/5) is the better choice when companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition.. If your situation matches those criteria, Addepto is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Provectus vs Addepto FAQ

Is Provectus better than Addepto?

Provectus (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Provectus is better for mid-market and enterprise buyers who want AI/ML delivery bundled with cloud and big-data engineering from one integrator.. Addepto is better for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition..

How do Provectus and Addepto differ in pricing?

Provectus uses fixed project and dedicated team engagements pricing with a minimum engagement of $50K. Addepto uses fixed project and consulting retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Provectus or Addepto?

Provectus is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Provectus and Addepto?

Provectus's primary differentiator is: combines ai/ml delivery with cloud and big-data engineering as a single integrated systems-integrator practice.. Addepto's primary differentiator is: boutique ai/bi consultancy that gained additional scale and resources through its december 2025 acquisition by kms technology.. They also differ in team size (501–1,000 vs 51–200), minimum engagement ($50K vs $20K), and primary industries served (Retail, Healthcare vs Financial Services, Retail).

Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.