ScienceSoft vs Addepto: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
Addepto (4.1/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.9/5) overall. Addepto is the better choice for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition.. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for companies wanting AI/ML delivered by a long-established generalist IT consultancy already handling other IT needs.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
ScienceSoft vs Addepto: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | ScienceSoft | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1989 | 2018 |
| HQ | McKinney, Texas, USA | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Best for | Companies wanting AI/ML delivered by a long-established generalist IT consultancy already handling other IT needs. | Companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project and Time & Material | Fixed project and consulting retainer |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K |
| Primary tech stack | Python, TensorFlow, AWS | Python, Scikit-learn, TensorFlow |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Retail, Financial Services, Manufacturing | Financial Services, Retail, Manufacturing |
ScienceSoft vs Addepto: overview
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft is an IT consulting and software development company founded in 1989, headquartered in McKinney, Texas, with additional offices in Europe, the UAE, and Vietnam. The firm reports more than 750 IT professionals and over 3,600 delivered projects across its 36-year history, with AI/ML positioned as one core service area among IT strategy consulting, cloud, cybersecurity, and quality assurance.
Addepto
Addepto is an AI and data consulting company founded in Warsaw, Poland in 2018 by Edwin Lisowski and Artur Haponik (one source lists 2017), specializing in machine learning, artificial intelligence, and business intelligence solutions. Reported headcount is roughly 55–58 employees across Europe, North America, and Asia. In December 2025, Addepto was acquired by KMS Technology; prospective clients should confirm how the acquisition affects team continuity, existing contracts, and service delivery going forward.
Services and capabilities: ScienceSoft vs Addepto
| Capability | ScienceSoft | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Custom ML model development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Deep learning & computer vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP & LLM / Generative AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps & production deployment | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI strategy consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: ScienceSoft vs Addepto
| Framework / platform | ScienceSoft | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| TensorFlow | ✓ | ✓ |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Cloud | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Databricks | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: ScienceSoft vs Addepto
| Criterion | ScienceSoft | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time & Material | Fixed project, Consulting retainer |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Enterprise / not published | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: ScienceSoft vs Addepto
| Dimension | ScienceSoft | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Retail, Financial Services | Financial Services, Retail, Manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Companies wanting AI/ML bundled with existing cloud, QA, or cybersecurity work from a single long-established vendor, Healthcare or manufacturing clients needing broad IT consulting plus a specific ML/AI component | Mid-market companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting now paired with KMS Technology's broader resources, Business intelligence projects that also require a machine learning component |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
ScienceSoft vs Addepto: pros and cons
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | 36 years of continuous operation and 3,600+ delivered projects (per company website) among the longest track records reviewed here |
| + | Over half of staff cited as senior-level specialists (per company website) |
| + | Broad IT service catalog means AI/ML can be bundled with cloud, security, or QA from the same vendor |
| + | Multi-region office presence (Europe, UAE, Vietnam) beyond the US HQ |
| - | AI/ML is one of several core services (alongside cloud, cybersecurity, QA) rather than the firm's defining specialty |
| - | Less AI-first branding or ML-specific certification profile than boutique AI consultancies on this list |
| - | Minimum engagement size not publicly disclosed |
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | 7 years of focused AI/BI consulting experience prior to the KMS Technology acquisition |
| + | Small team size historically meant direct founder-level access on engagements |
| + | Multi-continent presence (Europe, North America, Asia) despite a compact headcount |
| + | Acquisition by KMS Technology (Dec 2025) may bring additional delivery resources and stability |
| - | Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025 — buyers should confirm how this affects team continuity, pricing, and existing contracts before signing |
| - | Public sources disagree on exact founding year (2017 vs. 2018) and employee count (55 vs. 58) |
| - | Post-acquisition integration could change the service delivery model in ways not yet publicly documented |
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
ScienceSoft is the right choice for companies wanting AI/ML delivered by a long-established generalist IT consultancy already handling other IT needs..
36 years of continuous IT consulting history, one of the longest track records among firms on this list.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail, Financial Services, Manufacturing.
Who should choose Addepto?
Addepto is the right choice for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition..
Boutique AI/BI consultancy that gained additional scale and resources through its December 2025 acquisition by KMS Technology.. Minimum engagement starts at $20K. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Retail, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: ScienceSoft vs Addepto
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ScienceSoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: ScienceSoft (Not published) vs Addepto ($20K) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | ScienceSoft |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | ScienceSoft |
Use case fit: ScienceSoft vs Addepto
| Use case | ScienceSoft fit | Addepto fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Companies wanting AI/ML bundled with existing cloud, QA, or cybersecurity work from a single long-established vendor | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Healthcare or manufacturing clients needing broad IT consulting plus a specific ML/AI component | Strong | Limited | ScienceSoft |
| Mid-market companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting now paired with KMS Technology's broader resources | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
| Business intelligence projects that also require a machine learning component | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: ScienceSoft vs Addepto
Addepto (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Boutique AI/BI consultancy that gained additional scale and resources through its December 2025 acquisition by KMS Technology.. It is best for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition..
ScienceSoft (3.9/5) is the better choice when companies wanting AI/ML delivered by a long-established generalist IT consultancy already handling other IT needs.. If your situation matches those criteria, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
ScienceSoft vs Addepto FAQ
Is ScienceSoft better than Addepto?
Addepto (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ScienceSoft is better for companies wanting AI/ML delivered by a long-established generalist IT consultancy already handling other IT needs.. Addepto is better for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition..
How do ScienceSoft and Addepto differ in pricing?
ScienceSoft uses fixed project and time & material pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Addepto uses fixed project and consulting retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: ScienceSoft or Addepto?
ScienceSoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between ScienceSoft and Addepto?
ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: 36 years of continuous it consulting history, one of the longest track records among firms on this list.. Addepto's primary differentiator is: boutique ai/bi consultancy that gained additional scale and resources through its december 2025 acquisition by kms technology.. They also differ in team size (501–1,000 vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Retail vs Financial Services, Retail).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.